SLMC Forum Index SLMC
Second LifeŽ Music Community Forum
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Macs can do the job.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SLMC Forum Index -> MAC Users
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
KTravanti



Joined: 10 Oct 2007
Posts: 219
Location: SoCal

PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 6:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Zak Claxton wrote:
KTravanti wrote:
IMHO.. it is WAY easier to perform this way instead of using PC. Razz


Kori, in my less-than-humble opinion, everything on a Mac is easier and better than on a PC. Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy

But I don't say that in mixed company. I don't want to be accused of being a Mac Snob (although, hee hee, I pretty much am). Smile


In a very short time Zak I have become a Mac snob! lmbo!!!
_________________
When Words Are Not Enough
http://www.koritunes.com
http://www.myspace.com/korilinaec
http://www.ktravanti.blogspot.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Zak Claxton



Joined: 16 Oct 2007
Posts: 2008
Location: Podul/33/243/154/

PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 8:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My time isn't so short: I started using Macs in 1985, not very long after they were first introduced, and I've been using them personally and professionally ever since. I really have nothing against Windows machines at all. For me, the personal preference of using a Mac is based on the things that I do for work and pleasure... music, graphics, video, and so on. They're not for everyone. Just ones like me. Smile
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Silas Scarborough



Joined: 04 Sep 2007
Posts: 1184
Location: Rhode Island

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've got a Mac Quad and here's something I discovered the other day: My PC self-destructed several weeks so I've been running SL on the Mac and absolutely hating it. One of the reasons for that is audio streams were dropping out at unacceptable rates. I tried dropping SL max bandwidth to 100 and that helped but did not eliminate the problem. My next approach was to increase the CPU allowed Nicecast via the Quality setting. It had been set to about 25% and that was fine so long as SL was running somewhere else. Yesterday I tried increasing it to about 60% and didn't get a single drop even though I did nothing to reduce SL bandwidth.

Something I've meant to do for a while but have not tried as yet is to use the Archive function of Nicecast to capture the stream to disk. What benefit is there to using Audio Hijack over the Archive function? I'll guess that Audio Hijack is grabbing the audio when it's outbound from GarageBand and Archive is saving the audio after it's been compressed and is outbound from Nicecast, therefore the audio resolution in Hijack would be much better. Is this accurate?
_________________
Ever vigilant for da gooses overhead.

- Silas

My Web site is at myducksoup.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Zak Claxton



Joined: 16 Oct 2007
Posts: 2008
Location: Podul/33/243/154/

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Silas Scarborough wrote:
Something I've meant to do for a while but have not tried as yet is to use the Archive function of Nicecast to capture the stream to disk.


I use it all the time. By default, it captures a 128kbps MP3 file. It's perfectly fine for standard purposes like making Podcasts, putting audio examples on on your web site, and so on. I wouldn't use it to track a live album, of course, but for basic capture and Internet-based song sharing it's great.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Zed Essex



Joined: 05 Oct 2007
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:28 pm    Post subject: Recording a performance in high quality. Reply with quote

i use a mixer to blend my guitar with my voice before it enters into the computer. When I want to make a high quality recording I use the aux outputs in the mixer which are routed to my DAT machine. This is good cause other than this i have no use for my good ol' DAT Machine! But Silas is correct you are much better capturing audio before it goes thru an encoder. Mp3 encoders discard certain frequencies in addition to compressing the data, so if you need to record high quality audio it's better to avoid this.

If you have any questions about audio, fire away. I'm a recording engineer in RL!

Oh and for the record i bought my first MAC when I got my protools HD rig. At the time I was a died in the wool PC guy, but got the mac because there were more plugins available for it at the time and I only wanted to use that computer for serious recording.

Over time whenever my PC wouldn't do something i wanted I would try it on the MAC, and began to notice I got more work done on the Mac! I still use PCs tho, My Sl radio station runs on one, and I have another one I use for buring DVD;s and encoding video. The bulk of what I do is done on MAC computers tho. I find the MAC OS head and shoulders above Windows which seems to create a new problem for every solution! Especially Vista!



Zed


Last edited by Zed Essex on Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:35 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zak Claxton



Joined: 16 Oct 2007
Posts: 2008
Location: Podul/33/243/154/

PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:32 pm    Post subject: Re: Recording a performance in high quality. Reply with quote

Zed Essex wrote:
I'm a recording engineer in RL!


So am I. Zed and Zak are your engineering experts here. Very Happy
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
RayW



Joined: 05 Sep 2007
Posts: 563
Location: Twin Cities, MN

PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:33 pm    Post subject: Re: Recording a performance in high quality. Reply with quote

Zed Essex wrote:
If you have any questions about audio, fire away. I'm a recording engineer in RL!


Hey, Zed ... You should post some tips and what-nots on the FAQ section. Sounds like you could really add to that discussion. Very Happy

Not that you don't, too, Zak. All of us appreciate the input from you guys who have made a vocation at this. Smile
_________________
Ray
http://www.rayweyland.com
http://www.sounds-of-ray.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Morris Dawes



Joined: 30 Oct 2007
Posts: 9
Location: Salem, MA USA

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:18 pm    Post subject: Running SL on a PC while doing the music etc on the Mac Reply with quote

I think I read above about someone using one computer to run SL and at the same time another computer to run the music and audio. That sounds like a good idea to me. What if I were to run Logic and NiceCast on my iMac G5 and then another coumputer (say a Windows machine) to run SL so I could see the audience?

The reason I mentioned a Windows machine for running SL is that I would imagine that I could pick up somthung used on Craigslist or Ebay pretty cheap right? I'm not so up on the Windows world. What would you all recommend I look for in a Windows computer to run SL (only) while I use the Mac for music? How much would I expect to pay? Would a notebook Windows computer do the job?

Best,
Morris
_________________
Morris Dawes in SL
Morris Acevedo in RL
http://www.morrisacevedo.com
http://www.myspace.com/morrisacevedo/
http://www.negw.org
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Zak Claxton



Joined: 16 Oct 2007
Posts: 2008
Location: Podul/33/243/154/

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:28 pm    Post subject: Re: Running SL on a PC while doing the music etc on the Mac Reply with quote

Morris Dawes wrote:
I think I read above about someone using one computer to run SL and at the same time another computer to run the music and audio. That sounds like a good idea to me. What if I were to run Logic and NiceCast on my iMac G5 and then another coumputer (say a Windows machine) to run SL so I could see the audience?


I am one of the people who run them on two computers, and I'm VERY glad I do. I've had SL crash one computer many times in the middle of a show, but the computer streaming my audio keeps rolling right along.

Quote:
The reason I mentioned a Windows machine for running SL is that I would imagine that I could pick up somthung used on Craigslist or Ebay pretty cheap right?


I think it's a fine idea... just make sure that whatever you get has the sysreq that is capable of running SL.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
RayW



Joined: 05 Sep 2007
Posts: 563
Location: Twin Cities, MN

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 4:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have two computer, also. But, unlike Zak, I have SL on the powerhouse and use the old one to broadcast from.

Well, that is until today. Today my streaming LIVE into SL days are on hold. The old machine is dying ... it's been a slow one. But, twice in the last few days it just went into a coma.

So, soon (not soon enough) I'll be saying I run SL on the powerhouse and use the new machine to broadcast from. Very Happy

(Yah ... I know I'm not a Mac user ... my wife is ... so its in the family)
_________________
Ray
http://www.rayweyland.com
http://www.sounds-of-ray.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SLMC Forum Index -> MAC Users All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group